D 2021

USING IMAGE PROCESSING SOFTWARE DEVELOPED FOR B-IMAGING ON MR IMAGES BASED ON THRESHOLDING ALGORITHM IN A SELECTABLE REGION OF INTEREST

BLAHUTA, Jiří, Tomáš SOUKUP, Jan LAVRINČÍK and Lukáš PAVLÍK

Basic information

Original name

USING IMAGE PROCESSING SOFTWARE DEVELOPED FOR B-IMAGING ON MR IMAGES BASED ON THRESHOLDING ALGORITHM IN A SELECTABLE REGION OF INTEREST

Authors

BLAHUTA, Jiří (203 Czech Republic), Tomáš SOUKUP, Jan LAVRINČÍK (203 Czech Republic) and Lukáš PAVLÍK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)

Edition

Sofia, Bulgaria, 21st International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2021, p. 195-202, 8 pp. 2021

Publisher

International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference SGEM

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Stať ve sborníku

Field of Study

10201 Computer sciences, information science, bioinformatics

Country of publisher

Bulgaria

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Publication form

electronic version available online

Organization unit

Moravian Business College Olomouc

ISBN

978-619-7603-22-4

ISSN

Keywords in English

echogenicity index;MR-images;B-images

Tags

Změněno: 5/5/2022 10:45, Ing. Michaela Nováková

Abstract

V originále

In 2011, we developed our application for B-imaging based on binary thresholding algorithm in a selectable Region of Interest. This application has been used in many studies focused on ultrasound B-imaging in neurology; primarily for substantia nigra echogenicity examination and also for some different brain structures, e.g. mediotemporal lobe atrophy investigation. One of principal output value is an echogenicity index which is used as a marker of the echogenicity grade. Many published studies showed that is well applicable in B-imaging analysis. The lower index corresponds to the lower echogenicity grade and vice versa. Due to the principle of the thresholding of the images in gray-scale, the application could be also used for MR images. Thus, we have analyzed totally of 52 MR images to observe changing of the echogenicity index. In MR images, we have measured a dark and a light ROI area similarly as for different echogenicity of US image. We use the same descriptor as in the case of US images; the echogenicity index. In this study, images in DCM and IMA formats were analyzed. In result, the echogenicity index is significantly different for light and dark area. Thus, the application could be well-applicable also for MR images analysis. This is not a clinical study; we use the same ROI independently on examined structure. The ROI is placed on any dark and on any light area only to observe changing the echogenicity index. We have analyzed two features: the difference between dark and light area and the difference between two non-experienced observers. In all cases, the echogenicity index was higher for light than for dark area and in many cases more than triple. The difference between observers for the same image and the same ROI is insignificant. Minimal value of the index was 9.44 and maximal achieved was 105.67. In majority, the index > 50 for light area and under 50 for dark area. This is key feature that echogenicity index could be applied as a marker also for MR images.